AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology Micha
|
|
|
Top Searches for this datasheet
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
Michael Goddard
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. Place Sunnyvale, 94088
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
Defining Performance
1981 first offered sale. result success, succeeding generations were quickly made available based ever-higher performing engines: 286, 386, microprocessors. With each generation processor, users reaped benefits both better processor architectures higher clock frequencies. Over past years users have come view higher performance (which difficult quantify) being synonymous with higher frequency (which much easier quantify). believes that what people really care about, however, frequency their processor, performance delivers from their applications. Consider definition microprocessor performance: Processor Performance (Work Clock Cycle) (Clock Speed) see, while processor frequency contributes overall performance, only factor. frequency come sole indicator performance consumers? answer simple. first several generations microprocessors from both Intel (i.e. 8086, 286, 386, 486) were based same internal architecture therefore performed nearly identical amount work clock cycle. result, only variable performance equation frequency; therefore frequency really primary determinant performance.
Performance Frequency
With advent Athlonprocessor Intel Pentium processor, design architectures these companies fundamentally diverged.
This design divergence resulted difference work done clock cycle. Thus, microprocessors operating identical frequencies offer dramatically different levels performance. Consequently, frequency longer most meaningful metric judging relative microprocessor performance. Today's users need better
Page AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology October 2001
approach comparing relative processor performance. This approach must recognize that users: Care about performance applications that they care less about results synthetic tests Typically variety application software Care about performance system that they purchase Need ability easily simply conduct comparative shopping plans drive True Performance Initiative (TPI)-a strategic initiative with industry leaders consumer advocates develop reliable processor performance metric that users trust.
Benchmarking Methodology
Until metric available, committed accurately indicating application performance processors, assembled suite industry standard benchmarks applications that believe reflect typical user applications. Specifically, identified usage models, that believe best exemplify workstation user experience: Single-Threaded Multi-Threaded applications. following benchmarks applications used represent these user experiences: Single-Threaded SPECviewperf® 6.12 AWadvs-04, DRV-07, DX-06, Light-04, MedMCAD-01, ProCDRS-03 Indy3DMCAD-40, MCAD-150, Animation, Simulation eTesting Labs, Inc. Business Winstone2001, v1.0 Microsoft® Office 2000 (Access, Excel, Frontpage, PowerPoint, Word), Microsoft Project Lotus Notes NicoMak WinZip, Norton AntiVirus, Netscape Communicator eTesting Labs Inc. Content Creation Winstone2001, v1.0
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
Adobe® Photoshop® 5.5, Adobe Premier 5.1, Macromedia Director 8.0, Macromedia Dreamweaver 3.0, Netscape Navigator 4.73, Sonic Foundry Sound Forge BAPCOSYSmark2001, Office Productivity Microsoft Office 2000 (Access, Excel, Outlook, PowerPoint, Word), Netscape Communicator 6.0, Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred v.5, WinZip 8.0, McAfee VirusScan 5.13 BAPCO SYSmark 2001, Internet Content Creation Adobe Photoshop 6.0, Adobe Premier 6.0, Macromedia Dreamweaver 4.0, Macromedia Flash Microsoft Windows Media Encoder Winstone® v1.3 Dual Processor Inspection Tests High-End Microstation, High-End Photoshop, High-End Visual ScienceMark Cadalyst OpenGL, Non-graphics, Index SoftImage v.15 Cinema4D Shading (Cinema4D, OpenGL), Tracing (Single CPU) Alias Wavefront/Maya Multi-Threaded BAPCO SYSmark 2001, Office Productivity Microsoft Office 2000 (Access, Excel, Outlook, PowerPoint, Word), Netscape Communicator 6.0, Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred v.5, WinZip 8.0, McAfee VirusScan 5.13 BAPCO SYSmark 2001, Internet Content Creation Adobe Photoshop 6.0, Adobe Premier 6.0, Macromedia Dreamweaver 4.0, Macromedia Flash Microsoft Windows Media Encoder Winstone v1.3 Dual Processor Inspection Tests High-End Photoshop, High-End Visual
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
ScienceMark
SoftImage v.15 Cinema4D Tracing (Multiple CPU) Alias Wavefront/Maya results individual tests1 within usage model equally weighted averaged together create relative performance score that usage model (see Figure
125.0% 120.0% 115.0% 110.0% 105.0% 100.0% 95.0%
"Palomino" Core 1.33GHz "Palomino" Core 1.53GHz "Palomino" Core 1.33GHz AthlonMP 1.2GHz "Palomino" Core 1.4GHz "Palomino" Core 1.4GHz Athlon 1.2GHz "Palomino" Core 1.53GHz
90.0%
Single-Threaded Benchmarks Current Results
Multi-Threaded Benchmarks Updated Media Encoder Results
Figure Overall Workstation Performance2
When viewing these benchmark results attempting analyze their meaning, normalization process useful. This normalization process provides much easier reader compare data provides simpler method determining significance insignificance deltas performance. Configurations AthlonMP processor systems seen Appendix Normalized actual scores seen table Appendix respectively.
Please "Appendix Individual Benchmarking Test Methodology" detailed methodology used generate individual tests. Updated Microsoft® Windows® Media Encoder results contain software update that enables 3DNow!Professional technology version Microsoft Windows Media Encoder. This software patch publicly available; however subsequent versions Microsoft Windows Media Encoder planned enable support 3DNow! Professional technology. Please "Appendix Note SYSmark2001 Internet Content Creation" detailed explanation expected overall desktop performance. Page AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology October 2001
Since frequency should longer sole indicator performance, additional information must provided user better understand processor's performance capabilities. most useful information that which communicates relative real-world performance variety software applications.
Model Number Approach
Workstation processors based "Palomino" core marketed Athlon processor. consumer segment, developed model numbering convention communicating performance improvements Athlon processor relative performance currently available Athlon processor. Since both Athlon Athlon based same "Palomino" core, same model numbering convention used workstation segment desktop segment.
125.0% 120.0% 115.0% 110.0% 105.0% 100.0% 95.0%
AthlonMP 1.2GHz Athlon 1.2GHz Athlon 1500+ Athlon 1600+ Athlon 1800+ Athlon 1500+ Athlon 1600+ Athlon 1800+
90.0%
Single-Threaded Benchmarks Current Results
Multi-Threaded Benchmarks Updated Media Encoder Results
Figure Overall Workstation Performance with Model Numbers2
Updated Microsoft® Windows® Media Encoder results contain software update that enables 3DNow!Professional technology version Microsoft Windows Media Encoder. This software patch publicly available; however subsequent versions Microsoft Windows Media Encoder planned enable support 3DNow! Professional technology. Please "Appendix Note SYSmark2001 Internet Content Creation" detailed explanation expected overall desktop performance. Page AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology October 2001
initial Athlon processor models their corresponding frequencies shown below. Processor Model Number AthlonMP 1500+ AthlonMP 1600+ AthlonMP 1800+ Core Operating Frequency 1.33 1.40 1.53
relative application performance improvement between different members Athlon processor family supported benchmark graph shown Figure
Competitive Comparison
also important consider Athlon processors perform relative competitive processors. order provide accurate comparison between systems based Athlon processor systems based Pentium processor, system configurations were kept similar possible. details system configurations utilized this analysis listed Appendix purposes this comparison, used "best breed" system configurations both Intel processor-based systems. results have been normalized Athlon processor running 1.2GHz. Again, when viewing benchmark results attempting analyze their meaning, normalization process useful. Normalized actual scores seen table Appendix respectively. chart shown Figure summarizes these results. Athlon processor clearly provides performance advantage varying system price bands relative competitive processors available market. previous chart demonstrates different relative performance Athlon processors Pentium processors.
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
125.0% 120.0% 115.0% 110.0% 105.0% 100.0% 95.0% 90.0% Athlon 1500+ AthlonMP 1.2GHz
Pentium 1.5GHz
Pentium 1.6GHz
Pentium 1.8GHz
Pentium 2.0GHz
Xeon 1.7GHz
Athlon 1.2GHz
Athlon 1600+
Athlon 1800+
Athlon 1500+
Athlon 1600+
Single-Threaded Benchmarks
Current Results
Multi-Threaded Benchmarks
Updated Media Encoder Results
Figure Normalized Competitive Benchmark Results2
Summary
Over past years, processor frequency been used sole indicator comparing system performance. frequency itself determine processor performance become antiquated fundamental architectural differences that exist between Intel processors. processors benchmarked this comparison outperform their Intel counterparts noticeable margin. believes that idea solely using processor's frequency compare performance between Intel processors needs replaced approach measure processor performance.
Updated Microsoft® Windows® Media Encoder results contain software update that enables 3DNow!Professional technology version Microsoft Windows Media Encoder. This software patch publicly available; however subsequent versions Microsoft Windows Media Encoder planned enable support 3DNow! Professional technology. Please "Appendix Note SYSmark2001 Internet Content Creation" detailed explanation expected overall desktop performance.
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
Athlon 1800+
Appendix Individual Benchmarking Test Methodology
dynamic environment asynchronous nature performs specific task leads small inconsistencies benchmark results. example, every time benchmark application) run, changes made location data hard drive. These changes (called fragmentation) result minor differences score benchmarks that depend disk performance (e.g. Business Winstone 2001). With that mind, designed following procedure ensure consistency accuracy individual benchmark results. benchmark three times
CV3<2%
Take additional measurement
Determine three closest mean
Average those three closest mean Coefficient Variation SDn-1/xn
Official result
Figure Benchmarking Value Test Flowchart
coefficient variation measure relative dispersion data points. Designing test yield three data points that their coefficient variation less than percent means data points grouped together very tightly, thus test designed reveal repeatable accurate results.
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
Appendix Normalized Benchmarking Data
AthlonAMD Athlon Athlon Athlon 1.2GHz 1500+ 1600+ 1800+ SPECviewperf® 6.12 AWadvs-04 SPECviewperf 6.12 DRV-07 SPECviewperf 6.12 DX-06 SPECviewperf 6.12 Light-04 SPECviewperf 6.12 MedMCAD-01 SPECviewperf 6.12 ProCDRS-03 Indy3DMCAD-40 Indy3D MCAD-150 Indy3D Animation Indy3D Simulation Business Winstone2001 Content Creation Winstone2001 Winstone® v1.3 High-end Microstation Winstone v1.3 High-end Photoshop Winstone v1.3 High-end Visual SYSmark2001Office Productivity SYSmark 2001Internet Content Creation ScienceMark Cadalyst OpenGL Cadalyst Non-Graphics Cadalyst Index SoftImage v.15 Cinema Shading (Cinema4D) Cinema4D Shading (Open Cinema4D Tracing (Single CPU) Alias Wavefront/Maya Weighted Average Updated Media Encoder SYSmark 2001 Internet Content Creation Updated Media Encoder Weighted Avg. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 121.3% 101.1% Athlon 1.2GHz Winstone v1.3 High-end Photoshop Winstone v1.3 High-end Visual SYSmark 2001Office Productivity SYSmark 2001Internet Content Creation ScienceMark SoftImage v.15 Cinema4D Tracing (Multiple CPU) Alias Wavefront/Maya Weighted Average Updated Media Encoder SYSmark 2001 Internet Content Creation Updated Media Encoder Weighted Avg. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 111.7% 101.5% 100.2% 101.9% 100.3% 105.0% 100.8% 99.6% 101.3% 100.6% 102.0% 100.7% 107.9% 106.0% 105.7% 108.9% 104.7% 108.2% 110.0% 110.2% 101.3% 108.7% 105.8% 110.8% 109.4% 109.3% 110.9% 108.7% 107.0% 133.2% 108.1% 100.3% 102.7% 102.0% 106.9% 101.3% 99.6% 101.0% 100.9% 102.7% 101.4% 109.6% 108.6% 109.8% 112.1% 105.0% 112.0% 114.3% 115.4% 101.9% 112.1% 108.8% 116.0% 113.6% 113.7% 116.0% 112.6% 110.1% 138.1% 111.3% 103.7% 106.7% 106.7% 112.6% 101.2% 98.6% 101.5% 100.4% 104.2% 101.7% 118.9% 112.7% 115.4% 121.3% 111.6% 118.9% 124.8% 125.2% 104.6% 120.0% 115.5% 121.6% 121.4% 121.7% 127.0% 119.4% 116.4% 147.9% 117.5% Weight Pentium 1.5GHz 91.0% 133.9% 86.4% 103.6% 112.2% 99.5% 98.4% 102.6% 112.8% 96.5% 85.5% 85.7% 85.3% 105.5% 85.3% 93.3% 119.6% 82.1% 109.6% 88.1% 90.7% 82.8% 93.7% 90.6% 86.2% 92.8% 93.5% Pentium 1.6GHz 93.4% 137.9% 89.6% 107.8% 112.8% 99.5% 99.7% 102.5% 114.8% 97.4% 89.3% 89.1% 86.0% 110.9% 90.4% 98.9% 125.9% 87.5% 110.6% 92.9% 94.7% 87.8% 98.9% 95.7% 91.2% 97.9% 97.6% Pentium 1.8GHz 97.3% 141.5% 95.1% 115.0% 113.1% 99.6% 100.1% 102.9% 117.5% 98.4% 95.0% 96.6% 93.8% 122.1% 97.8% 105.8% 140.0% 97.7% 115.3% 102.6% 100.6% 97.5% 108.0% 105.4% 103.1% 107.4% 105.3% Pentium 2.0GHz 98.3% 143.1% 100.0% 121.0% 114.2% 99.6% 100.6% 103.4% 120.0% 99.7% 102.6% 101.7% 101.4% 131.0% 98.4% 114.0% 152.3% 107.8% 119.5% 111.2% 106.7% 109.5% 118.3% 114.8% 114.6% 117.6% 112.7% Weight
1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 5.00 5.00 3.33 3.33 3.33 5.00 5.00 10.00 3.33 3.33 3.33 10.00 3.33 3.33 3.33 10.00 100.00
Athlon Athlon Athlon Xeon 1.7GHz 1500+ 1600+ 1800+ 107.4% 103.1% 106.9% 109.6% 109.4% 111.2% 111.0% 107.7% 108.3% 123.2% 110.0% 109.7% 106.4% 111.2% 114.1% 115.1% 116.2% 116.7% 111.2% 112.6% 127.6% 114.3% 116.1% 107.4% 116.0% 121.4% 124.6% 120.1% 126.6% 119.0% 118.9% 136.3% 120.8% 112.4% 94.1% 105.3% 124.4% 90.7% 101.2% 101.9% 96.7% 103.4%
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
Appendix Actual Benchmark Data
AthlonAMD Athlon Athlon Athlon 1.2GHz 1500+ 1600+ 1800+ SPECviewperf® 6.12 AWadvs-04 SPECviewperf 6.12 DRV-07 SPECviewperf 6.12 DX-06 SPECviewperf 6.12 Light-04 SPECviewperf 6.12 MedMCAD-01 SPECviewperf 6.12 ProCDRS-03 Indy3DMCAD-40 Indy3D MCAD-150 Indy3D Animation Indy3D Simulation Business Winstone2001 Content Creation Winstone2001 Winstone® v1.3 High-end Microstation Winstone v1.3 High-end Photoshop Winstone v1.3 High-end Visual SYSmark2001Office Productivity SYSmark 2001Internet Content Creation Updated Media Encoder SYSmark 2001 Internet Content Creation ScienceMark Cadalyst OpenGL Cadalyst Non-Graphics Cadalyst Index SoftImage v.15 Cinema Shading (Cinema4D) Cinema4D Shading (Open Cinema4D Tracing (Single CPU) Alias Wavefront/Maya 114.7 19.6 38.5 33.3 39.5 97.8 36.4 48.3 74.9 55.5 72.9 11.6 10.6 150.0 142.7 173.0 112.5 70.3 56.6 15.0 44.2 12.3 21.6 16.7 125.0 Athlon 1.2GHz Winstone v1.3 High-end Photoshop Winstone v1.3 High-end Visual SYSmark 2001Office Productivity SYSmark 2001Internet Content Creation Updated Media Encoder SYSmark 2001 Internet Content Creation ScienceMark SoftImage v.15 Cinema4D Tracing (Multiple CPU) Alias Wavefront/Maya 17.2 14.0 158.3 208.7 233.0 221.6 25.1 28.4 79.3 114.9 20.0 38.6 33.6 39.3 99.1 36.6 49.2 75.4 59.9 77.3 12.6 11.1 162.3 157.0 190.0 124.0 71.2 61.6 15.9 39.9 13.5 23.6 18.6 115.0 115.0 20.2 39.3 33.7 39.3 98.8 36.7 49.6 75.9 60.9 79.2 13.0 11.2 168.0 163.0 197.0 129.9 71.6 63.5 16.4 38.1 14.0 24.5 19.4 111.0 118.9 20.9 41.1 33.7 38.9 99.2 36.6 50.3 76.1 66.0 82.2 14.1 11.9 178.3 178.0 211.0 140.9 73.5 68.0 17.4 36.4 15.0 26.3 21.2 104.7 92.4 77.0 49.9 13.6 53.4 11.6 19.6 14.4 134.7 98.5 77.7 52.6 14.3 50.4 12.2 20.7 15.3 127.7 110.0 81.0 58.1 15.1 45.4 13.3 22.7 17.2 116.3 121.3 83.9 63.0 16.1 40.4 14.6 24.8 19.2 106.3 Pentium 1.5GHz 104.4 26.3 33.3 37.4 39.3 96.2 37.3 54.4 72.2 47.5 62.5 12.2 140.0 170.7 Pentium 1.6GHz 107.2 27.1 34.5 37.6 39.3 97.5 37.3 55.4 73.0 49.6 64.9 12.9 148.3 179.7 Pentium 1.8GHz 111.6 27.8 36.6 37.7 39.3 97.9 37.5 56.7 73.7 52.7 70.4 14.2 10.4 158.7 199.7 Pentium 2.0GHz 112.8 28.1 38.5 38.1 39.3 98.4 37.6 57.9 74.6 57.0 74.1 15.2 10.5 171.0 217.3
Athlon Athlon Athlon Xeon 1.7GHz 1500+ 1600+ 1800+ 18.4 14.5 169.3 228.7 257.0 242.5 22.6 31.5 73.7 18.8 14.9 176.0 238.0 266.3 255.1 21.6 33.1 71.3 19.9 15.1 183.7 253.3 284.3 276.1 20.9 35.9 66.7 201.0 24.8 28.9 82.0 19.3 13.2 166.7 259.7
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
Appendix Note SYSmark2001 Internet Content Creation
SYSmark2001 Internet Content Creation benchmark components subtest Microsoft® Windows® Media Encoder version 7.0. Working with Microsoft, discovered that version Windows Media Encoder used SYSmark 2001 optimized 3DNow!Professional technology, does properly recognize AthlonMP processor including this performance enhancing feature therefore does enable use. Microsoft have generated tested software update that correctly recognizes Athlon processor, which planned integrated into next release Windows Media Encoder. tests previous graphs show significant performance improvement when Media Encoder updated, which more indicative performance benefits that user would see. This change planned available forthcoming release from Microsoft which users will have access after launch Windows
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
Appendix Benchmark System Configurations
AthlonMP Processor System Configurations
Operating System Version: Build DirectX Version: Processor Microsoft® Windows® 2000 Service Pack 5.00.2195 AthlonMP 1800+ Athlon 1600+ Athlon 1500+ Tyan Thunder 2.07a (publicly available) AMD-760MP Samsung PC2100 CAS2, Enabled 256MB (512MB Total) Cheetah ST318451LW Gigabytes Ultra Allied Telesyn Pcnet FAST AT-2700TX Creative Labs Sound Blaster Live! CT4830 Fire 64MB Publisher Name: Version: 522s Publisher Name: Version: 140a, Enabled: Publisher Name: Microsoft Version: 4.8.0.0 Publisher Name: Version: 5.21 Publisher Name: Microsoft Version: 5.0.2184.1 Publisher Name: Version: 2078 BIOS Version: 1.22 (1.14 SPECviewperf 6.12, Indy3D, Cadalyst Graphics Resolution: 1024x768 (1280x1024 SPECviewperf 6.12, Cadalyst SoftImage v.15, SPECapc Unigraphics V15) Color Depth: bit, Refresh Rate: 100hz (75hz SPECviewperf 6.1.2; 85Hz Cadalyst SoftImage v.15), Aperature Size: 256MB Fat32 File system Uniprocessor Kernel Benchmarks
Motherboard BIOS Info: Chipset: Memory Quantity Size: Hard Drive Model Number: Hard Drive Size: Transfer Mode: Network Card Model Number: Sound Card Model Number: Version Number: Video Card Memory Size (MB) Type: Drivers Miniport: EIDE: Network Card: SCSI Drivers: Sound Card: Video Card:
Other: (Specify other special conditions enhancements that made system.)
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
Intel Pentium® Processor System Configurations
Operating System Version: Build DirectX Version: Processor Microsoft® Windows® 2000 Service Pack 5.00.2195 Pentium® 1.5GHz Pentium 1.6GHz Pentium 1.8GHz Pentium 2.0GHz Intel 850MD (publicly available) Intel i850 Samsung PC800 RDRAM, Enabled 256MB (512MB Total) Cheetah ST318451LW Gigabytes Ultra Allied Telesyn Pcnet FAST AT-2700TX Creative Labs Sound Blaster Live! CT4830 Fire 64MB Publisher Name: Intel Version: 3.20.1005 Publisher Name: Intel Version: 6.10, Enabled: Publisher Name: Microsoft Version: 4.8.0.0 Publisher Name: Version: 5.21 Publisher Name: Microsoft Version: 5.0.2184.1 Publisher Name: Version: 2078 BIOS Version: 1.22 Graphics Resolution: 1024x768 (1280x1024 SPECviewperf 6.12, Cadalyst SoftImage v.15, SPECapc Unigraphics V15) Color Depth: bit, Refresh Rate: 100hz (75hz SPECviewperf 6.1.2; 85Hz Cadalyst SoftImage v.15), Aperature Size: 256MB Fat32 File system
Motherboard BIOS Info: Chipset: Memory Quantity Size: Hard Drive Model Number: Hard Drive Size: Transfer Mode: Network Card Model Number: Sound Card Model Number: Version Number: Video Card Memory Size (MB) Type: Drivers Miniport: EIDE: Network Card: SCSI Drivers: Sound Card: Video Card:
Other: (Specify other special conditions enhancements that made system.)
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
Intel Xeon Processor System Configuration
Operating System Version: Build DirectX Version: Processor Motherboard BIOS Info: Chipset: Memory Quantity Size: Hard Drive Model Number: Hard Drive Size: Transfer Mode: Network Card Model Number: Sound Card Model Number: Version Number: Video Card Memory Size (MB) Type: Drivers Miniport: EIDE: Network Card: SCSI Drivers: Sound Card: Video Card: Microsoft® Windows® 2000 Service Pack 5.00.2195 Xeon 1.7GHz Dell 530MT i860 (publicly available) Intel i860 Samsung PC800 RDRAM, Enabled 256MB (512MB Total) Cheetah ST318451LW Gigabytes Ultra Allied Telesyn Pcnet FAST AT-2700TX Creative Labs Sound Blaster Live! CT4830 Fire 64MB Publisher Name: Dell Version: 2.80.008, (5/22/01) Publisher Name: Dell Version: 2.80.008,a06 (5/22/01), Enabled: Publisher Name: Microsoft Version: 4.8.0.0 Publisher Name: Version: 5.21 Publisher Name: Microsoft Version: 5.0.2184.1 Publisher Name: Version: 2078 BIOS Version: 1.22 Graphics Resolution: 1024x768 (1280x1024 SPECviewperf 6.12, Cadalyst SoftImage v.15, SPECapc Unigraphics V15) Color Depth: bit, Refresh Rate: 100hz (75hz SPECviewperf 6.1.2; 85Hz Cadalyst SoftImage v.15), Aperature Size: 256MB Fat32 File system Uniprocessor Kernel Benchmarks
Other: (Specify other special conditions enhancements that made system.)
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
Overview
global supplier integrated circuits personal networked computer communications markets with manufacturing facilities United States, Europe, Japan, Asia. AMD, Fortune Standard Poor's company, produces microprocessors, Flash memory devices, support circuitry communications networking applications. Founded 1969 based Sunnyvale, California, revenues $4.6 billion 2000. (NYSE: AMD).
©2001 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. rights reserved. AMD, Arrow logo, Athlon combinations thereof, AMD-760 3DNow! trademarks Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Microsoft Windows registered trademarks Microsoft Corporation United States other jurisdictions. Pentium registered trademark Intel Corporation United States other jurisdictions. BAPCO SYSmark trademarks Business Applications Performance Corporation. Business Winstone Content Creation Winstone trademarks Winstone registered trademark Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc., affiliate eTesting Labs Inc., United States other jurisdictions. Adobe Photoshop registered trademarks Adobe Systems Incorporated. Indy3D trademark Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. SPECviewperf registered trademark Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC). Other product names used this publication identification purposes only. These tests were performed without independent verification their respective companies said companies make representations warranties results these tests.
Page
AthlonMP Processor Benchmarking Model Numbering Methodology
October 2001
Other recent searches
SKPH8Tiny - SKPH8Tiny SKPH8Tiny Datasheet
SKPK8Tiny - SKPK8Tiny SKPK8Tiny Datasheet
NTD4806N - NTD4806N NTD4806N Datasheet
L-45072 - L-45072 L-45072 Datasheet
KA-3528MWC - KA-3528MWC KA-3528MWC Datasheet
HA16117F - HA16117F HA16117F Datasheet
74LVC373A - 74LVC373A 74LVC373A Datasheet
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
© 2012 Datasheet Archive
